By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Travel Radar - Aviation NewsTravel Radar - Aviation News
  • Breaking News
  • Aviation
    • Aircraft
    • Airlines
    • Airshow & Events
    • Careers
    • Manufacturing
  • Travel
    • Airports
    • Points & Loyalty
    • Technology
    • Trip Reviews
  • Newsletters
Reading: Refuelling crew overfilled Singapore Airlines B777-200ER – Investigation Report
Share
Sign In
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Travel Radar - Aviation NewsTravel Radar - Aviation News
  • Breaking News
  • Aviation
    • Aircraft
    • Airlines
    • Airshow & Events
    • Careers
    • Manufacturing
  • Travel
    • Airports
    • Points & Loyalty
    • Technology
    • Trip Reviews
  • Newsletters
Signin Sign In
Follow US
Copyright © Travel Radar Media Ltd. 2025 | All Rights Reserved
Travel Radar - Aviation News > News > Refuelling crew overfilled Singapore Airlines B777-200ER – Investigation Report

Refuelling crew overfilled Singapore Airlines B777-200ER – Investigation Report

Jake Smith
Last updated: 29 June 2018 10:59
By Jake Smith 3 Min Read
Share
SHARE

Transport Safety Investigation Bureau (TSIB) of Singapore released the final report on Singapore Boeing 777-200ER, turn back due to fuel discrepancy.

What happened…

On 16 April 2014, while flying from Singapore to Johannesburg, the flight crew of a Boeing B777-200ER was prompted with a “FUEL DISAGREE” aircraft system message one hour into the flight. The flight crew noticed that, the fuel quantity onboard as calculated by the Flight Management Computer (FMC) based on the quantity of the fuel that had burnt off during the flight was less than the fuel quantity as measured by the aircraft’s fuel quantity indicating system (FQIS), and the difference between these two quantities was increasing.

After consulting the airline’s maintenance centre, the flight crew decided to return to Singapore. The aircraft landed in Singapore without incident.

After landing, and subsequent calculation showed that the aircraft had departed with some 127 tonnes of fuel, instead of 86 tonnes as displayed to the flight crew by the FQIS.

Action

The flight crew initially instructed the RDO, to fuel the aircraft to a total fuel quantity of 82 tonnes. The flight crew later gave an instruction for a final total fuel quantity of 86 tonnes

The CT had earlier noted from the cockpit fuel quantity indicator before the refuelling operation that there was about 5.5 tonnes of fuel in the aircraft remaining from the previous flight. The uplift of 121.5 tonnes of fuel would make a total of about 127 tonnes. This would mean 41 tonnes above the target figure of 86 tonnes.

In order to check the quantity of fuel on the aircraft, the team’s lead technician performed a ‘magnastick’ check, a manual reading using floating gauges.

Cause
The cause of the overfuel situation was that the B777-200ER aircraft was erroneously recognised as a B777-200 version by the FQIS owing to a fault in the PSM. This had resulted in the eight sensors within the mid-section of the centre fuel tank of the B777-200ER not being computed by the aircraft’s FQIS and caused an under-reading of the fuel quantity.

Fault
The CT and LT underwent training on refuelling operation which included theory on magnastick check. However, there were no practical session on magnastick check during their training on refuelling operation. In addition, magnastick check was not a commonly performed task in the course of their work.

You Might Also Like

Air Europa extends contract with Lufthansa Technik for component support for its entire 737 fleet

Flight Expert Abruptly Shuts as Fraud Investigation Takes Off

The Ultimate Guide to Internet Options at Haneda Airport

Why have Air Fares Increased?

An Update to Air Canada’s Goodwill Policy : Offering Reimbursement

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link
What’s your thoughts?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Angry0
Jake Smith
By Jake Smith
Director of Special Projects - Jake is an experienced aviation journalist and strategic leader, regularly contributing to the commercial aviation section of Travel Radar alongside leading strategy and innovation including livestreaming and our store.
Previous Article The Russian built Antonov –148 crash kills all 65 passengers and 6 crew on-board.
Next Article Aeroflot Group shareholders approved to purchase 50 MC-21-300.
Leave a comment
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
guest
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Upvoted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Stay Connected

FacebookLike
TwitterFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Trending News

London Gatwick Airport
August Bank Holiday Weekend to be the busiest, says Cirium
Airlines Aviation Travel
Close-up of an aircraft engine
CO₂ Emissions to Sustainable Aviation Fuel: How Finland is Piloting Production
Aviation Manufacturing
Air Canada flight attendant's strike
Air Canada flight attendants to end strike with the airline, after a tentative deal
Airline Economics Airlines
Boeing aircraft in the skies
Boeing in Talks with China with Potential for 500 Aircraft Sale
Aviation Manufacturing
Business Class in Emirates' Airbus A350
Emirates Set to Prohibit Passengers from using Power Banks
Aircraft Airlines
//

Travel Radar is the leading digital hub for all things aviation and air-travel. Discover our latest aviation news, aviation data, insight and analysis.

Discover

  • Latest News
  • Subscribe
  • Weekly Digest
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Media Coverage
  • Press & Events
  • Join Our Team
  • Our Brands

Signup to our Newsletter!

And get the latest aviation news via our weekly news digest!

© Travel Radar Media Ltd. 2015-2025 | ISSN #2635-0696 | Trademark #UK00003579704
wpDiscuz
adbanner
AdBlock Detected
Ads help us bring you high-quality, independent journalism for free. Support us by whitelisting us from your ad blocker.
Okay, I'll Whitelist
Welcome to the TR Community!

Sign in to your account

Register Lost your password?