By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Travel Radar - Aviation NewsTravel Radar - Aviation News
  • Breaking News
  • Aviation
    • Aircraft
    • Airlines
    • Airshow & Events
    • Careers
    • Manufacturing
  • Travel
    • Airports
    • Points & Loyalty
    • Technology
    • Trip Reviews
  • Newsletters
  • Aircraft for Sale
Reading: High Court pauses Dublin Airport’s summer 2025 passenger cap
Share
Sign In
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Travel Radar - Aviation NewsTravel Radar - Aviation News
  • Breaking News
  • Aviation
  • Travel
  • Newsletters
  • Aircraft for Sale
  • Breaking News
  • Aviation
    • Aircraft
    • Airlines
    • Airshow & Events
    • Careers
    • Manufacturing
  • Travel
    • Airports
    • Points & Loyalty
    • Technology
    • Trip Reviews
  • Newsletters
  • Aircraft for Sale
Signin Sign In
Follow US
Copyright © Travel Radar Media Ltd. 2025 | All Rights Reserved
Travel Radar - Aviation News > News > Aviation > Airlines > High Court pauses Dublin Airport’s summer 2025 passenger cap
AirlinesAirportsAviation

High Court pauses Dublin Airport’s summer 2025 passenger cap

Natasha Norris
Last updated: 6 November 2024 12:42
By Natasha Norris
4 Min Read
Share
Passengers pass through airport departures
A 2007 planning permission condition caps Dublin Airport's yearly passengers at 32 million © Dublin Airport
SHARE

A High Court judge has paused Dublin Airport’s 25.2 million passenger cap for summer 2025 following airline appeals.

Ryanair, Aer Lingus and Airlines for America (A4A), a trade association for US airlines, claimed the cap would threaten their “use them or lose them” take-off and landing slots.

Lawyers for the carriers argued the caps breached airlines’ right under EU law to “historic slots” based on previous use. Airlines must use these slots 80% of the time within a season to retain them the next year.

Ryanair claimed that losing its Dublin Airport slots would jeopardise corresponding slots at 67 European airports. Aer Lingus told courts that the Irish Aviation Authority (IAA) had only considered planning conditions from 2007 for the first time in its winter 2024/2025 passenger capacity assessment, which was unwarranted. A4A argued that the caps violated the US-EU Open Skies agreement.

Mr Justice Barry O’Donnell’s ruling on Monday came days before airlines’ summer slots are due to be allocated. His pause will apply until EU Courts rule on the passenger cap.

The judge explained that upholding the cap would have “immediate, serious consequences”. He added:

Those consequences extend beyond the immediate serious effects on the applicants, but include serious disruption for the public and potential harmful effects for the broader economy.

In a statement, Ryanair’s CEO Michael O’Leary blamed the legal challenge on Transport Minister Eamon Ryan’s inaction, commenting:

It is deeply regrettable that the airlines had to take legal action to stay the idiotic cap at Dublin Airport solely because Transport Minister, Eamon Ryan, wouldn’t do his job and issue a letter to the IAA.

The dispute follows a challenging summer for Ryanair, which reported an 18% fall in H1 after-tax profit compared to last year. The airline recently cut traffic estimates due to delays in Boeing’s delivery.

Ryanair, Aer Lingus and airport operator data will wait until December for a separate verdict on the IAA’s decision to limit winter passengers to 14.4 million from now until March 2025.

A man in a suit
Ryanair CEO Michael O’Leary has criticised IAA’s “idiotic” passenger cap © Clodagh Kilcoyne.

Why was a passenger cap imposed?

Fingal County Council implemented the 32 million passenger cap in 2007 as a condition of the construction of Dublin Airport’s second terminal. The cap aimed to limit disruption to roads around the airport.

The IAA’s 2024/2025 passenger capacity limits were based on the terminal planning constraints alongside technical, operational and environmental considerations. These include runway and airspace capacity, aircraft stand availability and passenger check-in and security processes.

The IAA stated:

The role of the IAA does not encompass any power to amend or revoke planning conditions, or any decision to enforce or not enforce conditions, which are all matters to be determined by the planning authorities, such as Fingal County Council. In that regard, it is also not for the IAA to assess the merits or otherwise of the condition itself.

In response to Monday’s ruling, the IAA added:

the alleged harm identified by the airlines flows from the planning conditions rather than from the IAA taking account of those conditions.

What do you think about airport passenger caps? Let us know in the comments below!

You Might Also Like

Korea to mandate use of SAFs for all international departures
Plaza Premium Group Unveils New Lounges at Techo International Airport
Qantas Confirms Cyberattack; Breach Could Impact up to 6 million Customers
Emirates returns to the Airshow After 15 Years Showcasing A350
Emirates offer a new daily service to Hangzhou
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link
What’s your thoughts?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Angry0
Natasha Norris
ByNatasha Norris
Aviation Reporter - Currently based in London, Natasha is passionate about travel and culture. She looks forward to learning about the aviation industry and sharing her interest in current affairs with Travel Radar’s readers.
Previous Article Image of Milan Duomo and Tokyo ANA Announces New Direct Milan-Tokyo Flight
Next Article American Airlines N787-8 Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner American Airlines extends flight cancellations to Israel
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
guest

guest

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Upvoted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Stay Connected

FacebookLike
TwitterFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Trending News

Qantas order 20 new A321XLR with 16 of them including lie-flat business seats
Qantas A220 Debuts on Brisbane–Wellington Route
Airlines Aviation Route Development
Singapore Airlines aircraft on runway
Singapore Airlines Returns to Riyadh Skies in 2026
Aircraft Airlines Aviation Route Development
An image of two aircraft tails that belong to SAS and TAROM
SAS and TAROM Expand Europe Connectivity
Airline Economics Airlines Aviation
A map of USA with sunglasses and a passport on top of it.
Gambling Regulations in Different Countries Travelers Should Know About
Aviation Travel Travel Radar
U.S. Coast Guard Petty Officer 2nd Class Lance Ide, left, and Petty Officer 3rd Class Corbin Singleton, boatswain’s mates at Station St. Inigoes, respond to the aircraft collision on the Potomac River, Washington, January 30, 2025. The Coast Guard responded to the incident with local, city, state and federal partners. (U.S. Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Christopher Bokum)
FAA Chief Accepts Failures in Midair Collision that Killed 67
Aircraft Aviation Incidents & Accidents Travel

Travel Radar is the leading digital hub for all things aviation and air-travel. Discover our latest aviation news, aviation data, insight and analysis.

 

Discover

  • Latest News
  • Subscribe
  • Weekly Digest
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Media Coverage
  • Press & Events
  • Join Our Team
  • Our Brands

Signup to our Newsletter!

And get the latest aviation news via our weekly news digest!

© Travel Radar Media Ltd. 2015-2026 | ISSN #2635-0696 | Trademark #UK00003579704
wpDiscuz
adbanner
Welcome to the TR Community!

Sign in to your account

Not a member? Sign Up