The recent decision to introduce ACMI (Aircraft, Crew, Maintenance, and Insurance) services in Thailand has sparked significant controversy. Amid pilot shortage claims and rising passenger demands, the Thai government has made a controversial decision. The move to introduce ACMI has been met with scrutiny within the aviation sector. The decision will allow foreign pilots to operate foreign registered wet-leased aircraft on domestic routes. The Thai Pilots Association criticises the move, claiming there is no genuine shortage of local pilots.
Controversy Surrounding the ACMI Decision
The controversial decision to introduce ACMI operations is being spearheaded by Thai SmartLynx. The company aims to address a growing seasonal demand for air travel in Thailand as the country’s tourism sector rebounds post-pandemic. However, critics argue that the entry of ACMI providers could cause more trouble than good. Thai Airways and other domestic carriers have expressed concern for the Thai aviation sector. The influx of ACMI operators may lead to price wars and increase competition in an already challenging market. Moreover, there are concerns that the introduction of foreign crews and maintenance staff could threaten job security among local airline employees.
The decision has been met with scrutiny from the Thai Pilots Association. The president of the association, Teerawat Angkasakulkiat claims a genuine shortage of local pilots doesn’t exist. According to data from the Civil Aviation Authority of Thailand (CAAT), there are currently 3,024 commercial pilots registered in the country. This figure includes 1,219 pilot school graduates who hold licenses but are still seeking employment. Teerawat has called on the Thai Government to reconsider its decision.
Regulatory and Economic Implications
The introduction of ACMI services raises regulatory as well as economic issues. The legal framework surrounding the decision presents challenges. Local carriers are reportedly advocating for domestic wet leases which recognise foreign aircraft and crew as equivalent to Thai licenses. However, discrepancies between this legislation and International Civil Aviation Orgnaisation (ICAO) standards, raise concerns about safety and regulatory compliance. Having once before been audited with a red flag by the ICAO in 2015, the potential for Thailand to receive one again could severely impact its global aviation reputation and post-pandemic recovery.
Despite backlash, the CEO of Thai SmartLynx, Apirak Homlaor expresses confidence in the intervention of ACMI services and the future landscape of the Thai aviation sector. In a statement to ch-aviation, Homlaor said:
Thai SmartLynx not only tackles the pressing challenge of aircraft shortages but also supports the professional growth of local pilots by ensuring more aircraft are available for operations.
What do you think about the controversy surrounding the ACMI decision in Thailand? Let us know in the comments
